tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post40923336169992596..comments2024-03-28T07:34:49.133+01:00Comments on The Genealogical World of Phylogenetic Networks: Motivations for producing the earliest pedigreesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-83393663168330939732016-12-20T13:25:28.101+01:002016-12-20T13:25:28.101+01:00It is an official anachronistic title, as it was &...It is an official anachronistic title, as it was "Rex Romanorum" by then, at least that's what you find on Wikipedia:<br /><br />> The title "King of the Romans", used under the Holy Roman Empire, is considered equivalent to King of Germany. A king was chosen by the German electors and would then proceed to Rome to be crowned emperor by the pope. <br /><br />Here's the original page: <br />Mattis Listhttp://lingulist.denoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-29550414960943131142016-12-14T08:30:08.421+01:002016-12-14T08:30:08.421+01:00Probably. But that is how it seems to be officiall...Probably. But that is how it seems to be officially reported, anyway. /DavidDavid Morrisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05469392205239443608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-61492290689582960952016-12-13T21:16:30.666+01:002016-12-13T21:16:30.666+01:00Isn't "King Henry of Germany" an ana...Isn't "King Henry of Germany" an anachronism, considering that the many German ministates were united only in the 19th C? Bernie Cnoreply@blogger.com