tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post877110021958023552..comments2024-03-04T05:48:31.080+01:00Comments on The Genealogical World of Phylogenetic Networks: Destroying the Tree of Life?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-64349079788065287772013-05-28T19:34:01.604+02:002013-05-28T19:34:01.604+02:00Thank you David for this post. As someone who work...Thank you David for this post. As someone who works in the area of phylogenetic networks, I can't help but get upset when I see uninformed titles such as "Darwin was wrong," since these titles and articles only increase, rather than decrease, resistance to network thinking. Even for most of us who work in the area of networks, we often view a network, infer it, and analyze it, in terms of its constituent trees. The Tree of Life is indeed well and alive; it's just that "it's more complicated than was realized before the advent of molecular genetics." <br /><br />Best,<br />Luay NakhlehAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10986491278444798980noreply@blogger.com