tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post2162556103303959380..comments2024-03-28T07:34:49.133+01:00Comments on The Genealogical World of Phylogenetic Networks: Hybridization in the world of duplication-transfer-lossUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-21710298095907584512016-07-06T15:33:04.614+02:002016-07-06T15:33:04.614+02:00I agree, working on it :)I agree, working on it :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11347627216784878998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-90901466836560805642016-07-06T15:18:50.451+02:002016-07-06T15:18:50.451+02:00Hej Céline!
Thanks for the link. The really intere...Hej Céline!<br />Thanks for the link. The <i>really</i> interesting thing, though, is how to get the network, rather than assume it!<br />DavidDavid Morrisonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05469392205239443608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8386055846297828307.post-22345955762575353002016-07-06T11:03:30.285+02:002016-07-06T11:03:30.285+02:00Hi David,
I personally call it transfer in (2) be...Hi David,<br /><br />I personally call it transfer in (2) because in this case the underlying (vertical) history of the species is a tree, and there are some punctual non-vertical events.<br /><br />I started working on reconciliations on networks lately, e.g. here <br /><br />http://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S10-S6 (only speciation, duplication and loss permitted) <br /><br />and I also have a submitted paper where I consider transfers too.<br />Have a nice day,<br /><br />CélineAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11347627216784878998noreply@blogger.com